Copyright© 2025. All Rights Reserved by EuroAmerican Education.
Geoeconomics: How Sanctions and Trade Wars Shape the Global Order
In 2025, power in the world is not only about armies or papers signed in big halls. Now it’s about money and geoeconomics—not tanks, but tariffs, sanctions, and trade wars working like weapons. Countries from the U.S. to China, Russia to India are fighting in markets, not just in borders.
This game has a name: Geoeconomics. It means nations use tools like trade barriers, export controls, and financial sanctions to push political goals. For Washington, it’s the U.S.–China economic rivalry. For Europe, it’s about handling Russia after the Ukraine war. For many developing nations like India, Mexico, or Vietnam, it brings both danger and chance—new risks but also new trade openings.
And why should anyone care? Because this is not only for presidents or ministers. Geoeconomics hits daily life—higher prices in shops, tariffs and sanctions fueling inflation, energy bills going up, jobs moving when supply chains shift. It matters for leaders, businesses, and everyday people alike.
Geoeconomics is the strategic use of economic tools for political or security outcomes. It combines trade, finance, and investment policy with national security.
Key instruments include:
Sanctions: Big powers like the U.S. and EU cut rivals off from trade, money, or new tech. Russia feels this with oil and banking limits, Iran with energy sales. Sanctions are now a main weapon in global politics.
Trade wars: Think U.S.–China fight over tariffs. Washington taxes Chinese EVs, steel, and solar panels. Beijing fires back. It’s not just two giants—Europe and India also jump in. Prices rise everywhere.
Investment controls: Governments block or check foreign money, especially from China, in defense, energy, 5G, and AI. The goal: protect national security and stop rivals from owning sensitive industries.
Supply chain shifts: Companies move production from China to Mexico, Vietnam, and India. Some bring factories back home to the U.S. or Europe. This “China+1 strategy” is about cutting risks and keeping supply chains safe.
Back in the 1990s, globalization meant cheap goods and faster trade. Now, the rules are different. The big words are security, resilience, and control.
Sanctions aren’t symbolic anymore—they are the sharpest tool in global power fights. The U.S. and EU use them to block rivals from trade, banking, and tech. The economic sanctions impact on global trade is huge: higher oil prices, broken supply chains, and new corridors opening between Russia, China, and India.
Russia faces tough sanctions post Ukraine war, whereas Iran stays under oil and finance limits. These moves ripple through global economy, energy prices, and supply chains.
Recent figures show the scale of this shift:
Between Oct 2023 and Oct 2024, export restrictions covered $230 billion worth of goods, up from $121 billion the year before.
As Western sanctions hit Russia, Russia–China trade surged 175%, from $140 billion (2021) to $245 billion (2024).
India–Russia trade increased 500% between 2021 and 2024, reaching $65 billion as India bought discounted oil.
In July, the EU added a fresh round of sanctions on Russian shipping and energy insurance, while the U.S. targeted Chinese firms accused of supplying dual-use tech to Russia’s defense sector. Meanwhile, Iran has deepened trade with Turkey and Gulf states, leveraging sanctions loopholes to keep its oil exports afloat.
Sanctions also extend to finance and technology:
SWIFT exclusions cut sanctioned banks off from global financial transactions.
Tech export bans, especially on semiconductors, restrict access to defense and AI-related technologies.
While sanctions bite, they also re-wire global commerce. Nations under pressure find new partners, shifting trade corridors and alliances.
The U.S.–China rivalry is the clearest example of geoeconomics in action.
In April 2025, the U.S. rolled out its biggest tariff hikes in a century. Over the past two months, Washington pushed further—adding new tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, steel, and solar panels. Beijing hit back with sharp criticism.
At the same time, the European Union opened a probe into Chinese EV subsidies, showing that trade fights are no longer just U.S. vs. China but spreading into Europe too.
While aimed at protecting American industries, the fallout is global:
U.S. consumers face higher prices for cars, electronics, and food.
Inflation pressures ripple through Europe and Asia.
Companies diversify supply chains into Mexico, Vietnam, and India.
Beyond the U.S.–China trade war 2025:
The European Union has introduced an Anti-Coercion Instrument (ACI)—a “trade bazooka” to counter economic intimidation.
BRICS nations are bypassing the U.S. dollar, expanding trade in yuan, rupees, and rubles.
Retaliation is already taking shape. China has signaled possible tariffs on U.S. agricultural imports, while Mexico warned that American protectionism could trigger disputes under the USMCA trade pact.
Trade wars, unlike sanctions, often trigger retaliation. Instead of winners and losers, they frequently create lose–lose scenarios—hurting global growth while raising uncertainty.
Winners
India, Vietnam, and Mexico: grabbing new business as supply chain diversification away from China. India has already passed China as the top trade partner for Gulf states. Vietnam signed fresh manufacturing deals with Apple and Samsung this summer. Mexico grows as U.S. firms move production closer to home.
Energy transit states like Iran and Turkey: cashing in on new East–West trade corridors.
BRICS bloc: pushing financial alternatives to cut Western control, trading more in yuan, rupees, and rubles.
Losers
Consumers worldwide: paying more and getting fewer choices as tariffs and sanctions bite.
Small businesses: struggling with higher costs and unstable logistics.
Global innovation: technology flows split by politics, weakening the innovation ecosystem. European automakers warn of profit drops from U.S.–China–EU tariff fights. African economies tied to dollar trade face rising debt as BRICS currency plans shake markets.
For Americans, the stakes are personal. Tariffs and sanctions affect:
Inflation – by raising the cost of imports and fuel.
Jobs – especially in industries reliant on global supply chains.
Business risks – from uncertainty in trade rules and retaliation.
Globally, the shift erodes traditional institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO), while strengthening regional alliances and corridors such as China’s Belt & Road and the Russia–India INSTC. Developing nations face both opportunities (as new suppliers) and risks (from unstable energy and food markets).
U.S.–China tariffs: Reshoring manufacturing but raising consumer costs.
Sanctions on Russia: Rewiring oil and gas flows toward Asia.
EU–China EV dispute: Probing state subsidies on Chinese electric cars.
BRICS de-dollarization: Growing trade in local currencies, reducing dollar reliance.
The global economy will increasingly reflect political divides. Expect:
Multipolar trade blocs: U.S. allies vs BRICS-led systems.
Currency competition: The dollar dominant but challenged by yuan and digital currencies. This also includes BRICS de-dollarization 2025 and alternative payment systems.
Tech sovereignty: Nations investing in domestic semiconductors and AI.
Regional trade corridors: Belt & Road, INSTC, and U.S.–Mexico reshoring reshaping commerce.
The BRICS summit in July confirmed plans to expand their Cross-Border Payment System, while Washington passed new incentives for AI chips production in Texas and Arizona—showing how fast tech and finance sovereignty are advancing.
Read Also : Why Choose United States for Studying Abroad?
The age of open globalization is over. Now it’s geoeconomics—where tariffs, sanctions, and finance rules act like weapons of power. Geoeconomics is basically the geopolitics of economics—about influence, leverage, survival.
For the U.S., the challenge is balance: protect national security but keep the economy strong. For the world, the new multipolar order means economics is not just growth anymore. It’s influence, leverage, and survival.
Don’t assume geoeconomics as a passing trend. It is the new global order.
Financial Times – The New Age of Geoeconomics (2025)
– Foundational analysis of geoeconomic dynamics shaping global power.
Munich Security Conference – Trade Wars Beyond Lose–Lose in the Age of Geoeconomics (2025)
– Insight into escalating trade conflicts and strategic fragmentation.
GIS Reports – Sanctions and Shifting Trade Routes (2024)
– Data on trade rerouting, including Russia–China and India–Russia shifts.
The Wall Street Journal – Trump Steps Up His Fight With BRICS Nations (2025)
– Coverage of tensions between the U.S. and BRICS over currency and trade.
Columbia Business School – Firms Restructuring Under Tariff Threats (2024)
– Impact analysis of corporate supply chain adjustments.
Le Monde – Russia, Iran and the Fast Track to a New World Order (2024)
– Geopolitical shifts in energy corridors and alliances.
New York Life Investments – Geopolitics and Shifting World Order Report (2024)
– Strategic overview of finance and tech in geoeconomic competition.
Reuters – U.S. expands steel and aluminum tariffs—adding 407 product categories, including wind turbines, railcars, and EV components (August 19, 2025).
Reuters – U.S. opens national security probe into imported wind turbines under Section 232, following 50% tariffs (effective Aug 13)—aimed at reducing foreign supply chain dependency (August 21, 2025).
Yahoo Finance – U.S. and EU agree to a written trade framework (July 2025).
China Briefing – U.S.–China tariff truce extended by 90 days to November 10, 2025, halting tariff escalation (August 12, 2025).
Times of India – Ahead of the July 2025 BRICS summit, member countries push for trade settlement in national currencies—no unified currency plan yet (June/July 2025).
Reuters – At the Rio de Janeiro BRICS summit (6–7 July 2025), leaders reaffirm exploring a cross-border payment system to reduce reliance on traditional global financial systems.
Debuglies / Economic Reports – The Technical Report: BRICS Cross-Border Payments System was published during July’s summit, outlining a framework modeled on India’s UPI to enable low-cost, fast, and interoperable cross-border payments.
